UFE response to ACER consultation on prioritising the removal of barriers to electricity demand response
02 February 2024
Inscriptions et réservations en ligne sur le site dédié à cet événement annuel
Inscrivez-vous !
The signatories of this letter strongly support the EU’s decarbonisation ambition/objectives. The ongoing revision of the Renewable Energy Directive (RED III) will result in ambitious incentives for renewable hydrogen in industry and transport through binding targets. Focusing these targets on RFNBOs without taking into account the potential of low carbon hydrogen will slow down the decarbonization process in heavy industry and transport. We therefore call on co-legislators to design a pragmatic framework for hydrogen in RED III. This can be done by combining ambitious RFNBOs objectives and the needed recognition of low-carbon hydrogen to meet the triple challenge of decarbonization, security of supply and industrial leadership on key sectors for net zero.
We are involved in a global race. Taking into consideration the need for deployment speed throughout legislation will be key to keep the Union’s leadership on hydrogen and maintain a strong heavy industry basis in Europe. Low-carbon hydrogen is complementary to RFNBOs to scale up the final uses of hydrogen and its derivatives, and thereby to structure the whole related upstream value chain. Depending on the territories, it can unlock the delivery of larger hydrogen volumes, in a faster and more competitive way. More importantly, steady hydrogen supplies are needed for heavy industries to switch their process to clean hydrogen (e.g steel manufacturing, ammonia and methanol synthesis). This can be provided by a combination of low carbon hydrogen and RFNBOs especially when hydrogen transport and storage assets will take time to emerge. Finally, the current geopolitical context is a vivid reminder that producing hydrogen in Europe is essential to avoid creating new energy dependencies.
As RFNBOs binding targets are (rightly) ambitious, designing their calculation without any consideration for the volumes of low carbon hydrogen, will result in a severe lack of level-playing-field for low carbon hydrogen and will thereby obstruct the related projects. Such a framework would delay electrolysis industrial deployment and industry decarbonization, expose the EU hydrogen and heavy industries to significant risks, and create de facto a discrimination between Member States by limiting the potential to yield the benefits of their various energy mix.
We would like to propose, as a compromise, to exclude low carbon hydrogen consumed in industry and transport from the denominator used to calculate the binding volume objective of RFNBOs. This formula:
This proposal is not about introducing low carbon energy within the renewable energy directive nor limiting the potential of renewable hydrogen, but only a legitimate request for adjusting the denominator basis.
We support the EU’s ambition to become a global hydrogen leader and we are willing to invest. But, in the global race that is taking shape, we urgently need a pragmatic and balanced framework on clean hydrogen.
EU co-legislators have the opportunity to unlock the hydrogen potential during the next trilogue sessions on RED III. Let’s seize it!
Yours sincerely,
Signatories: