UFE response to ACER consultation on prioritising the removal of barriers to electricity demand response
02 February 2024
Inscriptions et réservations en ligne sur le site dédié à cet événement annuel
Inscrivez-vous !
UFE does not propose any threshold because it might be very arbitrary, in the absence of any relevant methodology to define it, even if we noted that in its regular Bidding Zone Configuration Technical Report, the “frequency of occurrence” of congestions is a measure currently used by ENTSOE.
First, it is very important to clarify and cautiously assess the implications this threshold would have regarding provisions in E. Regulation Article 14 notably:
Second, UFE ask to clarify the framework of this consultation, the motivations and objectives pursued by ACER and the reasons why it is proposed as an amendment of E. Regulation.
We believe that neither CACM GL nor E. Regulation is the right place to determine the level of a threshold.
As mentioned in UFE answer to EC consultation on ACER proposal on CACM 2.0 beginning 2022, in case a threshold is to be defined, a detailed methodology should be developed and made public, to assess per Member State the adequate level of the threshold. At this stage, we think it is more cautious to keep some latitude to determine this threshold in the frame of a subsequent methodology to be developed.